When large numbers of people are harmed by the same product, drug, or event, the legal process can seem overwhelming. Two common legal remedies in these situations are mass tort and class action lawsuits. While both involve groups of plaintiffs, there are key differences in how these cases proceed and how compensation is awarded.
Understanding a Mass Tort
A mass tort lawsuit allows multiple individuals to file claims against one or more defendants for similar injuries caused by the same wrongful act — such as exposure to a dangerous drug, defective medical device, or toxic substance. Each plaintiff maintains an individual claim, which allows for compensation based on their specific damages.
Common examples include:
- Harmful prescription medications
- Defective medical devices
- Environmental contamination
- Consumer product failures
How a Class Action Differs
In a class action, one or several plaintiffs represent an entire group in a single case. The outcome applies equally to all members of the class, regardless of individual differences in harm or damages. In contrast, mass torts allow more individualized outcomes, which can lead to fairer compensation for victims with unique circumstances.
Why Choose a Mass Tort?
Mass torts are often preferable when:
- Injuries vary in severity from person to person
- Victims incurred different financial losses
- Each case requires individualized medical or factual evidence
Our Role in Mass Tort Litigation
The attorneys at Sullivan Papain Block McManus Coffinas & Cannavo P.C. are deeply involved in complex mass tort litigation, including cases involving defective drugs, medical devices, and toxic exposures. Our team helps clients across the country navigate the process, ensuring their voices are heard and their individual injuries are fully represented.